Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in distinct object" » "coder coder in distinct effect" (Expand search), "coder coder in distinct effects" (Expand search), "coder coder in distinct aspects" (Expand search), "coder decoder in distinct object" (Expand search), "code code in distinct object" (Expand search), "decoder codec in distinct object" (Expand search), "coder coder in distance object" (Expand search), "coder coder of distinct object" (Expand search), "coder coder _ distinct object" (Expand search), "coder code in distinct object" (Expand search), "coder codes in distinct object" (Expand search), "coder poder in distinct object" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in distinct object") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in distinct object\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in distinct object ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in distinct object") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.