Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in dialogical programming" » "coder coder in logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in pedagogical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in digital programming" (Expand search), "coder coder and dialogical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder _ dialogical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder of dialogical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder in dialogical programming" (Expand search), "code code in dialogical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec in dialogical programming" (Expand search), "coder code in dialogical programming" (Expand search), "coder codes in dialogical programming" (Expand search), "coder poder in dialogical programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in dialogical programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in dialogical programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in dialogical programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in dialogical programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.