Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in dependent programming" » "coder coder in independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder in element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder spin dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder in dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code in dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec in dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder code in dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder codes in dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder poder in dependent programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in dependent programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in dependent programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in dependent programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in dependent programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.