Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in dependent programming" » "coder coder in independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder in element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder spin dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder in dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code in dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec in dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder code in dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder codes in dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder poder in dependent programming" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in dependent programming") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in dependent programming\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in dependent programming ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in dependent programming") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.