Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in consequence relation" » "coder coder in consequence relations" (Expand search), "coder coder in consequence operator" (Expand search), "coder coder and consequence relation" (Expand search), "coder coder its consequence relation" (Expand search), "coder coder _ consequence relation" (Expand search), "coder decoder in consequence relation" (Expand search), "code code in consequence relation" (Expand search), "decoder codec in consequence relation" (Expand search), "coder code in consequence relation" (Expand search), "coder codes in consequence relation" (Expand search), "coder poder in consequence relation" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in consequence relation\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in consequence relation ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in consequence relation") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.