Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in cobol programming" » "coder coder in robot programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in robots programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in goal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder in cobol programming" (Expand search), "code code in cobol programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec in cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder code in cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder codes in cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder poder in cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in cobalt programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in cocoa programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in coal programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in cobol programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in cobol programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in cobol programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in cobol programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.