Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in automating processes" » "coder coder in automatic processes" (Expand search), "coder coder in automated processes" (Expand search), "coder coder in coating processes" (Expand search), "coder coder on automating processes" (Expand search), "coder coder and automating processes" (Expand search), "coder coder did automating processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder in automating processes" (Expand search), "code code in automating processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec in automating processes" (Expand search), "coder code in automating processes" (Expand search), "coder codes in automating processes" (Expand search), "coder poder in automating processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in automating processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in automating processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in automating processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in automating processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.