Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in affective programming" » "coder coder in objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in collective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder on affective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder and affective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder of affective programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder in affective programming" (Expand search), "code code in affective programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec in affective programming" (Expand search), "coder code in affective programming" (Expand search), "coder codes in affective programming" (Expand search), "coder poder in affective programming" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in affective programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in affective programming\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in affective programming ) OR ( via python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in affective programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.