Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder improving parallelism programming" » "coder coder improving parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coder improving parallel programing" (Expand search), "coder coder improving paralel programming" (Expand search), "coder coder exploiting parallelism programming" (Expand search), "coder codegen improving parallelism programming" (Expand search), "coder conquer improving parallelism programming" (Expand search), "coder models improving parallelism programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder improving parallelism programming" (Expand search), "code code improving parallelism programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec improving parallelism programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder improving parallelism programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder improving parallelism programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder improving parallelism programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder improving parallelism programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.