Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder implication in programming" » "coder code implications in programming" (Expand search), "coder model implication in programming" (Expand search), "coder power implications in programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implications in programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implications on programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implication of programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implication and programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implication _ programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implication c programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder implication in programming" (Expand search), "code code implication in programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec implication in programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder implication in programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder implication in programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder implication in programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder implication in programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.