Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder implementing plc's programming" » "coder after implementing plc's programming" (Expand search), "coder or implementing plc's programming" (Expand search), "coder toward implementing plc's programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementing ples programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementing prices programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementing process programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementing plc programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementing c programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementing block programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder implementing plc's programming" (Expand search), "code code implementing plc's programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec implementing plc's programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder implementing plc's programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder implementing plc's programming ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder implementing plc's programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.