Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder implementations at programming" » "coder model implementations at programming" (Expand search), "coder code implementation at programming" (Expand search), "coder core implementations at programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementation at programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementations and programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementations of programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementations arts programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementations data programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder implementations at programming" (Expand search), "code code implementations at programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec implementations at programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder implementations at programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder implementations at programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder implementations at programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder implementations at programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.