Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder implementation time programming" » "coder code implementation time programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder implementation time programming" (Expand search), "coder model implementation time programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementation the programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementation bim programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementation timing programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementation line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder implementation game programming" (Expand search), "code code implementation time programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec implementation time programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder implementation time programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder implementation time programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder implementation time programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder implementation time programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.