Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder hiring process object" » "coder coder curing process object" (Expand search), "coder coder charging process object" (Expand search), "coder coder bidding process object" (Expand search), "coder coder hiring process project" (Expand search), "coder coder hiring process effect" (Expand search), "coder coder hiring process affect" (Expand search), "coder code sharing process object" (Expand search), "coder code mixing process object" (Expand search), "coder code mining process object" (Expand search), "coder decoder hiring process object" (Expand search), "code code hiring process object" (Expand search), "decoder codec hiring process object" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder hiring process object") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder hiring process object\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder hiring process object ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder hiring process object") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.