Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder having defective processing" » "coder coder having affective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder having reactive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder having executive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder causing defective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder having defects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder among defective processing" (Expand search), "coder model having defective processing" (Expand search), "coder cowpea having defective processing" (Expand search), "coder codes hamming defective processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder having defective processing" (Expand search), "code code having defective processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec having defective processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder having defective processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder having defective processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder having defective processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder having defective processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.