Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder going plc programming" » "coder coder going c programming" (Expand search), "coder coder going block programming" (Expand search), "coder coder going _ programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder going plc programming" (Expand search), "code code going plc programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec going plc programming" (Expand search), "coder codes going plc programming" (Expand search), "coder coders using plc programming" (Expand search), "coder coder going public programming" (Expand search), "coder coder going places programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder going plc programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder going plc programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder going plc programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder going plc programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.