Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder going cobol programming" » "coder coder going robot programming" (Expand search), "coder coder going control programming" (Expand search), "coder coder going robots programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder going cobol programming" (Expand search), "code code going cobol programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec going cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder codes going cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder coders using cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder coder going global programming" (Expand search), "coder coder going mobile programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder going cobol programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder going cobol programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder going cobol programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder going cobol programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.