Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder generation discursive process" » "coder coder conversation discursive process" (Expand search), "coder coder interaction discursive process" (Expand search), "coder coder education discursive process" (Expand search), "coder coder generation discursive practices" (Expand search), "coder code generation discursive process" (Expand search), "coder power generation discursive process" (Expand search), "coder model generation discursive process" (Expand search), "coder decoder generation discursive process" (Expand search), "code code generation discursive process" (Expand search), "decoder codec generation discursive process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder generation discursive process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder generation discursive process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder generation discursive process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder generation discursive process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.