Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder functions revisited programming" » "coder coder functions website programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functions definite programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functions oriented programming" (Expand search), "coder coder function revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functions related programming" (Expand search), "coder coder action revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder power functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder order functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder colour functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "code code functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec functions revisited programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder functions revisited programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder functions revisited programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder functions revisited programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder functions revisited programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.