Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder functioning physical programming" » "coder coder functional physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder function physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder questioning physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functioning pascal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functioning graphical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functioning visual programming" (Expand search), "coder models functioning physical programming" (Expand search), "coder proper functioning physical programming" (Expand search), "coder role functioning physical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder functioning physical programming" (Expand search), "code code functioning physical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec functioning physical programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder functioning physical programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder functioning physical programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder functioning physical programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder functioning physical programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.