Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder functional dependent programming" » "coder coder functional independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functional dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder functional element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functionally dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functional dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder coder functional dependency programming" (Expand search), "coder modern functional dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder border functional dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder order functional dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder functional dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code functional dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec functional dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder functional dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder functional dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder functional dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder functional dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.