Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder function revisited programming" » "coder coder function website programming" (Expand search), "coder coder function definite programming" (Expand search), "coder coder function oriented programming" (Expand search), "coder coder function register programming" (Expand search), "coder coder condition revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder modern function revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder power function revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder over function revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder function revisited programming" (Expand search), "code code function revisited programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec function revisited programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder function revisited programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder function revisited programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder function revisited programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder function revisited programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.