Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder function procedural prolog" » "coder coder functions procedural prolog" (Expand search), "coder coder injunction procedural prolog" (Expand search), "coder coder action procedural prolog" (Expand search), "coder coder function procedural ecology" (Expand search), "coder coder function procedural prison" (Expand search), "coder coder function procedural protocol" (Expand search), "coder modern function procedural prolog" (Expand search), "coder power function procedural prolog" (Expand search), "coder over function procedural prolog" (Expand search), "coder decoder function procedural prolog" (Expand search), "code code function procedural prolog" (Expand search), "decoder codec function procedural prolog" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder function procedural prolog") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder function procedural prolog\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder function procedural prolog ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder function procedural prolog") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.