Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder function predictive program" » "coder coder function prediction program" (Expand search), "coder coder fraction predictive program" (Expand search), "coder coder function predictions program" (Expand search), "coder coder function prediction programs" (Expand search), "coder coder function predictive nomogram" (Expand search), "coder coder function predictive hologram" (Expand search), "coder modern function predictive program" (Expand search), "coder power function predictive program" (Expand search), "coder over function predictive program" (Expand search), "coder decoder function predictive program" (Expand search), "code code function predictive program" (Expand search), "decoder codec function predictive program" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder function predictive program") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder function predictive program\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder function predictive program ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder function predictive program") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.