Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder function prediction process" » "coder coder function production process" (Expand search), "coder coder function reduction process" (Expand search), "coder coder function predictive process" (Expand search), "coder modern function prediction process" (Expand search), "coder power function prediction process" (Expand search), "coder over function prediction process" (Expand search), "coder decoder function prediction process" (Expand search), "code code function prediction process" (Expand search), "decoder codec function prediction process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder function prediction process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder function prediction process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder function prediction process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder function prediction process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.