Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder frequency dependent programming" » "coder coder frequency independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder frequency dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder frequency element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sequence dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder lower frequency dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder power frequency dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder over frequency dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder frequency dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code frequency dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec frequency dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder frequency dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder frequency dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder frequency dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder frequency dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.