Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder following sequential processing" » "coder coder following sequential process" (Expand search), "coder coder following sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder following sequential cropping" (Expand search), "coder coder employing sequential processing" (Expand search), "coder coder exploiting sequential processing" (Expand search), "coder coder following dental processing" (Expand search), "coder model following sequential processing" (Expand search), "coder power following sequential processing" (Expand search), "coder nodes following sequential processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder following sequential processing" (Expand search), "code code following sequential processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec following sequential processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder following sequential processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder following sequential processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder following sequential processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder following sequential processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.