Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder field dependence programming" » "coder coder field dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder field independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder field dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder and dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder field dependence programming" (Expand search), "code code field dependence programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec field dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder cover field dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder under field dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder power field dependence programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder field dependence programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder field dependence programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder field dependence programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder field dependence programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.