Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder feeding efficient programming" » "coder coder feeding efficient processing" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding efficiency programming" (Expand search), "coder coder seeding efficiency programming" (Expand search), "coder coder selecting efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder powder feeding efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder under feeding efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder worker feeding efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder feeding efficient programming" (Expand search), "code code feeding efficient programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec feeding efficient programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder feeding efficient programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder feeding efficient programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder feeding efficient programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder feeding efficient programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.