Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder feeding diets processing" » "coder coder feeding diet processing" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding its processing" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding sets processing" (Expand search), "coder powder feeding diets processing" (Expand search), "coder under feeding diets processing" (Expand search), "coder worker feeding diets processing" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding direct processing" (Expand search), "coder coder feedlot diets processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder feeding diets processing" (Expand search), "code code feeding diets processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec feeding diets processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder feeding diets processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder feeding diets processing ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder feeding diets processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.