Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder exploring passing objects" » "coder coder exploring passive objects" (Expand search), "coder coder exploring housing objects" (Expand search), "coder coder exploring learning objects" (Expand search), "coder wonder exploring passing objects" (Expand search), "coder cancer exploring passing objects" (Expand search), "coder elders exploring passing objects" (Expand search), "coder coder exploring talking objects" (Expand search), "coder coder exploring naming objects" (Expand search), "coder coder exploring using objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder exploring passing objects" (Expand search), "code code exploring passing objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec exploring passing objects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder exploring passing objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder exploring passing objects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder exploring passing objects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder exploring passing objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.