Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder exploiting sequential processes" » "coder coder employing sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder exploiting sequential process" (Expand search), "coder coder exploiting referential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder exploiting spatial processes" (Expand search), "coder cancer exploiting sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder models exploiting sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder water exploiting sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder exploiting sequential processes" (Expand search), "code code exploiting sequential processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec exploiting sequential processes" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder exploiting sequential processes") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder exploiting sequential processes\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder exploiting sequential processes ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder exploiting sequential processes") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.