Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder exploiting sequential process" » "coder coder employing sequential process" (Expand search), "coder coder exploiting referential process" (Expand search), "coder cancer exploiting sequential process" (Expand search), "coder models exploiting sequential process" (Expand search), "coder water exploiting sequential process" (Expand search), "coder decoder exploiting sequential process" (Expand search), "code code exploiting sequential process" (Expand search), "decoder codec exploiting sequential process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder exploiting sequential process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder exploiting sequential process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder exploiting sequential process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder exploiting sequential process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.