Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder explicit instructional process" » "coder coder explicit instruction process" (Expand search), "coder coder explicit instructions process" (Expand search), "coder coder implicit instruction process" (Expand search), "coder coder explicit instructional powers" (Expand search), "coder coder explicit interactional process" (Expand search), "coder coder explicit institucional processo" (Expand search), "coder poder explicito instructional process" (Expand search), "coder order explicit instructional process" (Expand search), "coder body explicit instructional process" (Expand search), "coder decoder explicit instructional process" (Expand search), "code code explicit instructional process" (Expand search), "decoder codec explicit instructional process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder explicit instructional process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder explicit instructional process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder explicit instructional process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder explicit instructional process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.