Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder existing practices act" » "coder coder mediating practices act" (Expand search), "coder coder writing practices act" (Expand search), "coder coder eating practices act" (Expand search), "coder over existing practices act" (Expand search), "coder co existing practices act" (Expand search), "coder poder existir practices act" (Expand search), "coder coder existing practices at" (Expand search), "coder coder existing practices and" (Expand search), "coder coder existing practices an" (Expand search), "coder decoder existing practices act" (Expand search), "code code existing practices act" (Expand search), "decoder codec existing practices act" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder existing practices act") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder existing practices act\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder existing practices act ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder existing practices act") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.