Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder example allocation problem" » "coder coder sample allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder coder example applications problem" (Expand search), "coder coder people allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder coder example location problem" (Expand search), "coder code examples allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder counter example allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder coffee example allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder decoder example allocation problem" (Expand search), "code code example allocation problem" (Expand search), "decoder codec example allocation problem" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder example allocation problem") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder example allocation problem\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder example allocation problem ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder example allocation problem") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.