Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder estimation algorithm in" » "coder coder estimation algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder coder optimization algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder coder optimization algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder model estimation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder power estimation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder order estimation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder coder estimation algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder coder estimation algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder coder estimation algorithm with" (Expand search), "coder decoder estimation algorithm in" (Expand search), "code code estimation algorithm in" (Expand search), "decoder codec estimation algorithm in" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder estimation algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder estimation algorithm in\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder estimation algorithm in ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder estimation algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.