Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder encodes an effect" » "coder coder decoder an effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder encodes an effect" (Expand search), "code code encodes an effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec encodes an effect" (Expand search), "coder coder encodes _ effect" (Expand search), "coder coder encoded in effect" (Expand search), "coder coder encodes nagt effect" (Expand search), "coder coder encodes an effective" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder encodes an effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder encodes an effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder encodes an effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder encodes an effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.