Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder enabling efficient detection" » "coder coder enabling efficient production" (Expand search), "coder coder enhancing efficiency detection" (Expand search), "coder coder underlying efficient detection" (Expand search), "coder coder retailing efficiency detection" (Expand search), "coder decoder enabling efficient detection" (Expand search), "code code enabling efficient detection" (Expand search), "decoder codec enabling efficient detection" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder enabling efficient detection") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder enabling efficient detection\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder enabling efficient detection ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder enabling efficient detection") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.