Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder employing temporal programming" » "coder coder employing textual programming" (Expand search), "coder coder employing temperature programming" (Expand search), "coder coder employing fetal programming" (Expand search), "coder model employing temporal programming" (Expand search), "coder node employing temporal programming" (Expand search), "coder models employing temporal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder employing temporal programming" (Expand search), "code code employing temporal programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec employing temporal programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder employing temporal programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder employing temporal programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder employing temporal programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder employing temporal programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.