Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder embeddings in programming" » "coder node embeddings in programming" (Expand search), "coder node embedding in programming" (Expand search), "coder word embeddings in programming" (Expand search), "coder coder embeddings and programming" (Expand search), "coder coder embeddings _ programming" (Expand search), "coder coder embeddings c programming" (Expand search), "coder coder embedding in programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder embeddings in programming" (Expand search), "code code embeddings in programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec embeddings in programming" (Expand search)
"and python python python programming" » "and pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "and piton python python programming" (Expand search), "and pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder embeddings in programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder embeddings in programming\") OR (\"and python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder embeddings in programming ) OR ( and python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder embeddings in programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))*.