Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder embeddings generative programming" » "coder coder embeddings declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder embeddings genetic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder embeddings objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder embedding generic programming" (Expand search), "coder node embeddings generative programming" (Expand search), "coder node embedding generative programming" (Expand search), "coder word embeddings generative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder embeddings generative programming" (Expand search), "code code embeddings generative programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec embeddings generative programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder embeddings generative programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder embeddings generative programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder embeddings generative programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder embeddings generative programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.