Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder embeddings declarative programming" » "coder coder embeddings reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder embeddings generative programming" (Expand search), "coder node embeddings declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder node embedding declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder word embeddings declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder embeddings declarative programming" (Expand search), "code code embeddings declarative programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec embeddings declarative programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder embeddings declarative programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder embeddings declarative programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder embeddings declarative programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder embeddings declarative programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.