Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder efficiently controls programming" » "coder coder efficiency control programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficiently control programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficiently control programme" (Expand search), "coder coder efficiently cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder more efficiently controls programming" (Expand search), "coder cases efficiently controls programming" (Expand search), "coder codec efficiency controls programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder efficiently controls programming" (Expand search), "code code efficiently controls programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec efficiently controls programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder efficiently controls programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder efficiently controls programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder efficiently controls programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder efficiently controls programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.