Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder efficient conic programming" » "coder coder efficient logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficient cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficient convex programming" (Expand search), "coder power efficient conic programming" (Expand search), "coder codec efficiency conic programming" (Expand search), "coder codes efficiency conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficient chronic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficient congo programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficient conflict programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder efficient conic programming" (Expand search), "code code efficient conic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec efficient conic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder efficient conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder efficient conic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder efficient conic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder efficient conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.