Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder efficiency parallels programming" » "coder coder efficiency parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficiency parallel programing" (Expand search), "coder coder efficiency paralel programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficient parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coder efficiency parameters programming" (Expand search), "coder codec efficiency parallels programming" (Expand search), "coder codes efficiency parallels programming" (Expand search), "coder cover efficiency parallels programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder efficiency parallels programming" (Expand search), "code code efficiency parallels programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec efficiency parallels programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder efficiency parallels programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder efficiency parallels programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder efficiency parallels programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder efficiency parallels programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.