Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder effects descriptive programming" » "coder coder effects reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effects declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effects generative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effect description programming" (Expand search), "coder coder events descriptive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effects distributive programming" (Expand search), "coder cover effects descriptive programming" (Expand search), "coder border effects descriptive programming" (Expand search), "coder copper effects descriptive programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder effects descriptive programming" (Expand search), "code code effects descriptive programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec effects descriptive programming" (Expand search)
"and python python python programming" » "and pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "and piton python python programming" (Expand search), "and pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder effects descriptive programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder effects descriptive programming\") OR (\"and python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder effects descriptive programming ) OR ( and python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder effects descriptive programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))*.