Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder effectivity linear programming" » "coder coder effectivity in programming" (Expand search), "coder the effectivity linear programming" (Expand search), "coder and effectivity linear programming" (Expand search), "coder inter affectivity linear programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder effectivity linear programming" (Expand search), "code code effectivity linear programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec effectivity linear programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder effectivity linear programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder effectivity linear programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder effectivity linear programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder effectivity linear programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.