Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder effective declarative programming" » "coder coder effective reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder defective declaration programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effective degradation programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effective refractive programming" (Expand search), "coder model effective declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder over effective declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder under effective declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder effective declarative programming" (Expand search), "code code effective declarative programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec effective declarative programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder effective declarative programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder effective declarative programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder effective declarative programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder effective declarative programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.