Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder effect dependent programming" » "coder coder effect independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effect dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder effect element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effects dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effector dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder effects independent programming" (Expand search), "coder border effect dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder powder effect dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder copper effect dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder effect dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code effect dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec effect dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder effect dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder effect dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder effect dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder effect dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.